The focal point of this paper is Jews acting on their own initiative to save lives while trapped in the Nazi regime during the war years 1939-1945. By analogy to the Righteous Among the Nations, the Jews who tried to save other Jews are defined in this paper as those whose actions were targeted at saving Jews with no direct family kinship, while putting themselves at risk for no personal benefit. In cases where rescuers belonged to organizational rescue machinery, but went beyond their original task by personal risk, and/or did not opt to rescue themselves, they are included in the category of individual rescuers. Because rescuers are those who stand at the center of this paper, and not the survivors, there is no distinction between successful rescue operations and failed rescue attempts.

The theme of individual Jews acting to save other Jews hardly drew attention as a stand-alone topic. The compiled data unravels a phenomenon surprising in scope which points to a vast array of intentional and systematic initiatives. This is the basis of the initial presumption that these events should be treated as a phenomenon and not as a random collection of local incidents. This phenomenon deserves to be researched independently alongside other forms of Jewish reaction during the Holocaust such as armed resistance, mutiny, or organized actions of rescue.

The paper presents a complete picture of this phenomenon by reviewing and classifying separate events of rescue initiatives by individual Jews: Educators and care givers who tried to save children; Functionaries in the camps who used their positions to save others; Rescue initiatives of medical crews; Private initiatives to rescue through smuggling and immigration; Rescuing in family camps based in forests, and the rescue activities of individual prisoners targeted at fellow prisoners. Among these groups, the paper focuses on the group of doctors by examining their actions in two facets. A wide-ranging facet which examines the doctors’ actions in the various conditions prevailing under the Nazi occupation: in the ghettos, the concentration camps, the partisans in the forests, and prisons. The second facet is an in-depth examination of two Jewish doctors in the Auschwitz concentration camp.

Unlike other rescue initiators, the Jewish doctors were forced into making fateful decisions and take part in actions that risked their lives vis-à-vis not only the Germans but also their colleagues. Hence, their professional future was at times at risk after the war as well. The Jewish doctors treated all prisoners, regardless of religion, and here lies their distinction. Prima facie, it was their commitment as doctors. Since not all doctors fulfilled that, those who did stand out even more by risking their lives and future beyond necessary in order to remedy and save whenever possible. This is how Doctor Perl described it: “The Hippocratic Oath for me was the holiest of things, my conscience’s decree and every word of the oath was engraved deep in my heart.” Despite being an observant woman faithful to her people, this statement expresses precedence of the Hippocratic Oath over Jewish solidarity. The statement points to the fact that the terms rescue and Jewish solidarity are not identical, though often misused interchangeably. It is time to name this phenomenon of rescue initiatives by Jews properly and research it further.

Supervisor:
Prof. Hagit Lavsky

Kindertransport is the accepted term for the large-scale scheme responsible for sending about 10,000 unaccompanied mostly Jewish children out of Nazi occupied countries to safety in Britain, between December 1938 and the outbreak of the World War II. According to the “official” numbers published, this figure included 9,354 children reported to have arrived from Germany and Austria, and 669 were to have been sent out of Prague.

Given that the children’s transports from Prague have been commonly presented as part of the centrally organized large-scale Kindertransport from Nazi occupied territory to Britain, this thesis proves that the Prague scheme originated from a different wide-scale response to the refugee crisis of unprecedented magnitude. It offers a comprehensive approach to the emergence of the Kindertransport in Prague, focusing on its unique features as a humanitarian effort involving a platform of activists from different niches of life.

A comprehensive historical overview is provided to contextualize the distinctiveness of the Czech Kindertransport within the broader refugee crisis. This is followed by a comparison of the Prague transports with those from Berlin and Vienna and a discussion of the British policy and the Anglo-Jewry, identifying the organizational problematic issues in London and in Prague. The research further illuminates the different groups and individuals instrumental in arranging the departure of the children from Prague, focusing on the interaction and collaboration among them. Finally, a case study is presented to illustrate the unique situation in Prague.

The concluding chapter rounds off this thesis. The Czech Kindertransport was an initiative that emerged against the backdrop of the refugee crisis in Prague and against the urgent necessity to bring Jewish children to safety in Britain, independently of the transports organized from Berlin and Vienna. This research clearly proves that the Prague transports appeared to be unique in terms of their circumstances, scope, and key actors.

Supervisor:
Prof. Hagit Lavsky

This study examines the role of Baltic German settlers in Litzmannstadt as both beneficiaries and enforcers of Nazi expropriation policies, focusing on five case studies. By analyzing official files, letters, diaries, and memoirs, it reconstructs five cases’ personal trajectories within Nazi administrative and economic structures, exploring how they (un)consciously contributed to the Final Solution – a fact they later evaded acknowledging.

In an interdisciplinary approach bridging history and psychology, this research integrates micro-historical analysis to uncover silences, omissions, and selective remembering in postwar narratives. Rational Choice Theory provides insight into the settlers’ pragmatic calculations under Nazi rule, while memory studies expose strategies of self-exoneration, reframing complicity through displacement and victimhood. The findings challenge the perception of Baltic Germans as passive actors, revealing their active participation in racial expropriation and genocide, even when framed as a bureaucratic or economic necessity.

By combining historical and psychological perspectives, this study contributes to debates on collaboration, bureaucratic complicity, and the legacy of Nazi occupation. It underscores the fragility of moral boundaries under totalitarian rule and highlights the mechanisms through which individuals became complicit in state crimes. The practical implications serve as a reminder that administrative structures and ideological conditioning can facilitate atrocities – a warning that remains relevant today.

Supervisor:
Prof. Hans-Jürgen Bömelburg